PMI-ACP Practice Questions #44
A project involves a large team with partially defined requirements and a mix of stable and evolving technological components. The organization has some agile readiness but also relies on traditional reporting structures. Which approach is most suitable?
A. Scrum
B. Hybrid
C. Waterfall
D. ScrumBan
Analysis
The project involves a large team, partially defined requirements, a mix of stable and evolving technologies, and an organization that has some Agile readiness but still relies on traditional reporting structures. Given these characteristics, a purely Agile or traditional Waterfall approach may not be the best fit. The ideal approach should balance Agile flexibility with traditional structures, making Hybrid the most suitable choice.
Analysis of Options
A: Scrum
Scrum is a fully Agile framework that works well for small, cross-functional teams with evolving requirements. However, the presence of traditional reporting structures and only partial Agile readiness suggests that Scrum alone may not be the best fit. A more adaptable approach is required.
B: Hybrid
Hybrid project management combines Agile and traditional methodologies. Given the organization’s partial Agile readiness and reliance on traditional reporting, a Hybrid approach allows flexibility in evolving components while maintaining structured reporting for stable elements. This makes Hybrid the most appropriate choice for balancing Agile and traditional project management needs.
C: Waterfall
Waterfall is a predictive methodology that works best when requirements are well-defined and stable upfront. Since the project has partially defined requirements and evolving technological components, Waterfall would not be flexible enough to accommodate changes, making it an unsuitable choice.
D: ScrumBan
ScrumBan is a combination of Scrum (structure) and Kanban (flow-based flexibility). While ScrumBan is useful for projects with continuous delivery needs, it is not specifically designed to integrate traditional reporting structures, which the organization in this scenario still relies on. Therefore, ScrumBan is not the best fit here.
Conclusion
The most suitable approach for this scenario is Option B: Hybrid, as it allows for structured Agile adoption while accommodating traditional reporting needs. It provides the right balance of flexibility and control, ensuring smooth project execution in a mixed Agile-traditional environment.
PMI – ACP Exam Content Outline Mapping
| Domain | Task |
| Mindset | Embrace Agile Mindset |
Topics Covered:
- Hybrid Approach: Balances Agile flexibility with traditional reporting structures.
- Handling Partially Defined Requirements: Allows iterative refinement while maintaining structured planning.
- Managing Large Teams: Supports scalability through a mix of Agile and traditional practices.
- Stable vs. Evolving Technologies: Uses structured planning for stable components and Agile adaptability for evolving ones.
- Agile Readiness: Gradual transition to Agile while maintaining existing reporting expectations.
- Traditional Reporting Integration: Supports compliance with organizational reporting needs.
If you’re preparing for the PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP)® Exam, we highly recommend enrolling in our PMI-ACP® Exam Prep Program. Designed to provide a comprehensive Agile learning experience, this program not only helps you ace the PMI-ACP® exam but also enhances your Agile mindset, leadership skills, and ability to deliver value-driven projects. Ensure exam success and career growth with our expert-led, structured preparation program tailored for Agile professionals.
